Agentic solutions

From writing software to directing it.

Agentic development isn't the same SDLC at higher speed. The shape changes: humans set intent and review outcomes, agents do the drafting and the routine work in between. We help you make that transition deliberately, and instrument it so you can tell whether it's actually working.

Traditional SDLC Humans write, machines run.
  • Requirements documents handed off.
  • Engineers translate intent to code by hand.
  • Reviews catch defects after the fact.
  • Velocity bound by headcount.
  • Value measured in tickets closed.
Agentic solutions Humans direct, agents draft.
  • Intent expressed in templates and prompts, versioned in GitHub.
  • Agents draft, refactor, and test inside guardrails.
  • Reviews happen at the gate, with automation underneath.
  • Velocity bound by what's worth doing.
  • Value measured in outcomes shipped.
Mode 01 · A la carte

Pick the piece you need.

A prompt template library. A repo of reference agents. A GitHub Actions workflow for evaluation. A code-review agent tuned to your standards. Use what helps. Skip what doesn't.

scoped · flat-fee · delivered in days
Mode 02 · Tailored factory

An AI factory shaped to your environment.

We assess your stack, your data boundaries, and your review culture. Then we install the templates, tools, and agents that make sense for your team. You own the line. We tune it, write the manual, and keep updating it as the work changes.

install · train · keep tuning
Mode 03 · Active partner

Inside your development lifecycle.

We embed in your sprints, pair with your engineers, run the evaluation harness, and own the agent fleet alongside your leads. Outcomes-on-the-board accountability.

embedded · outcome-bound · alongside your team
Human-in-the-loop

Agents act. People decide.

Autonomy is a dial. The point of an agent is to add to a person's reach. Every agent we ship has a named human owner, an explicit point of review, and a clear rule for when it stops and asks. We design the loop on purpose, then we instrument it so the loop holds under load.

Human-in-the-loop is not a checkbox at the end of the project. It's an operating discipline: the right person, at the right gate, with the right context, making the call that matters.

The agentic development loop, with humans on the gate.

Every agent we ship runs this loop. Five phases, one runtime, and a human-in-the-loop gate that can escalate when stakes are high or confidence is low.

agent flow escalate to human
decompose execute evaluate trace next pass runtime Agent memory · tools · logs Phase 01 Intent goal · constraints · data scope Phase 02 Plan decompose · pick tools Phase 03 Act call tools · observe Phase 04 · HITL gate Check eval · policy · confidence Phase 05 Reflect trace · update · retry escalate when stakes high · confidence low Human reviewer named owner · SLA
Read this as Every cycle is a unit of work the runtime can trace, score, and replay. Most pass on green. The few that don't surface to a named owner with the full context attached. Not a Slack ping into the void. runtime · v2.4
The four gates we design
Gate 01
Intent.
A human writes the goal, the constraints, and the data the agent is allowed to touch. The prompt is a contract, versioned in the repo, signed by a name.
Gate 02
Action.
High-stakes actions (money out, records changed, citizens contacted) require an explicit human approval. Low-stakes work runs, with a sample held back for review.
Gate 03
Exception.
When the agent's confidence drops, the data falls outside policy, or a tool returns something unexpected, the loop closes. The work pauses and a human picks it up where the agent left off.
Gate 04
Review.
Every agent has a weekly review, every action has an audit trail, and every owner has a dashboard showing what their agent did and where it asked for help.
Security & architecture

Sensitive data stays where it belongs.

Most AI failures aren't model failures. They're data-handling and access failures. We design every engagement around three questions that have to be answered before anything ships: what data can the agent touch, where does the model run, and who is accountable when it acts.

Pattern 01 · Cloud

Public-grade cloud, with the right boundaries.

For work that doesn't touch regulated or proprietary data: drafting, code, research synthesis, public-facing content. Hosted on enterprise or FedRAMP-aligned infrastructure (Azure, AWS, Google Cloud, plus their public-sector tiers) with tenant isolation and data-residency controls.

  • Frontier models, no hardware footprint.
  • Pay-as-you-go, scale on demand.
  • Allow-listed providers; no shadow AI.
public · internal-low · drafts
Pattern 03 · On-prem

Local models for the data that can't leave.

For HR records, financials, customer PII, and anything else covered by regulation or contract. Open-weight models (Llama, Mistral, Gemma) running on your hardware or in a sovereign tenant. Data never crosses the perimeter.

  • From a single workstation to a small GPU rack.
  • Same agent code as the cloud path; different engine.
  • Air-gap-friendly when the policy demands it.
sensitive data requiring on-premise data processing

Three requests, one gateway, three destinations.

The hybrid pattern in motion: every request is classified at the gateway, then routed to the smallest model that's allowed to handle it.

Live routing
Drafting a memo staff laptop Pub Vendor SOW review procurement system Int Employee record HR system Res AI gateway Classify Authorize Route every call · logged Frontier model FedRAMP cloud cloud Tenant model private cloud tenant Local model on-prem GPU on-prem
Public → cloud
Drafts, public records, research synthesis. Routed to a frontier model on FedRAMP-aligned infra.
Internal → tenant
Vendor docs, drafts, redacted material. Routed to a model in your private tenant with residency controls.
Restricted → on-prem
Regulated, sensitive, or proprietary data: HR, finance, customer records, anything covered by HIPAA, CJIS, FERPA, or contract. Routed to an open-weight model on your hardware. Data never leaves the perimeter.
Read this as Sensitivity decides destination. The gateway is the only call site that knows your policy, and the only one that has to be right. Everything downstream just runs the model it was given. every call · logged

Defense in depth, applied to agents.

Agents introduce new failure modes (prompt injection, over-broad tool access, memory poisoning) on top of the ones your security team already manages. We layer the controls so a single mistake never reaches the data.

Governance
Audit and oversight Every action logged. Every decision explainable. A trail your auditors recognize.
Network
Segmentation On-prem, private cloud, and public cloud kept in separate lanes with explicit crossings.
Identity
Authenticated agents Every agent has an identity. Every call is signed. No anonymous tool use.
Authorization
Least-privilege by default Citizens see their own data. Staff see their department. Agents see only what their role unlocks.
Code
Sandboxed development Agents are built and validated in isolation before they touch production. Version-controlled, peer-reviewed, rollback-ready.